[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zlv8k1w0.fsf@saeurebad.de>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:49:51 +0100
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...urebad.de>
To: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>
Cc: "Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Marc Pignat" <marc.pignat@...s.ch>, wim@...ana.be,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] watchdog on gpio
Hi,
"Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com> writes:
> wonder if we could design a printk designed for __init functions to
> address this in a clean fashion.
> #define init_printk(fmt, __VA_ARGS__) \
> do { \
> static const __init char __fmt[] = fmt; \
> printk(__fmt , ## __VA_ARGS__); \
> } while (0)
>
> (yes, i know this isnt perfect as you'd need to pass back the return
> value of printk(), but it's an idea)
How about:
#define init_printk(fmt, args...) ({ \
static const __init char __fmt[] = fmt; \
printk(__fmt, args); \
})
Now it returns the printk result.
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists