[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080114152853.GB20551@csn.ul.ie>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:28:53 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch 09/19] (NEW) more aggressively use lumpy reclaim
On (08/01/08 14:30), Christoph Lameter didst pronounce:
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> > If normal pageout does not result in contiguous free pages for
> > kernel stacks, fall back to lumpy reclaim instead of failing fork
> > or doing excessive pageout IO.
>
> Good. Ccing Mel. This is going to help higher order pages which is useful
> for a couple of other projects.
>
Well, the patch only has any impact when the order you are reclaiming is
less than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER so I would not have considered it of major
impact to other projects interested in high order allocations. However, in
isolation I have no problem with this patch and I can see how it makes sense
for the problem scenario described. I rebased just this patch to 2.6.24-rc7
and found no problems but I have not had the chance to review the whole set.
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists