linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] driver: ip27-rtc - convert ioctl to unlocked

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:27:00 +0100
From:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
CC:	Paul Gortmaker <p_gortmaker@...oo.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver: ip27-rtc - convert ioctl to unlocked_ioctl

On 01/14/2008 05:07 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> Yes, process would be stopped, and not *just* stopped but could spend
> all his cpu time-slice in attempt to get spinlock (espec if set time is
> much longer than read), but if we use mutex here the process could just
> sleep instead of trying to get spinlock granted. Am I wrong? Or this is
> not worth to do it?

I would say no. It'll spin only for nanoseconds there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/