[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801141925070.24893@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:25:31 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: travis@....com
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
mingo@...e.hu, Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] x86: Change NR_CPUS arrays in topology
On Jan 13 2008 10:34, travis@....com wrote:
>+++ b/include/asm-x86/cpu.h
>@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
> #include <linux/nodemask.h>
> #include <linux/percpu.h>
>
>-struct i386_cpu {
>+struct x86_cpu {
> struct cpu cpu;
> };
> extern int arch_register_cpu(int num);
Is not struct x86_cpu kinda redundant here if it only wraps around
one member?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists