lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801141925070.24893@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:25:31 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	travis@....com
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	mingo@...e.hu, Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] x86: Change NR_CPUS arrays in topology


On Jan 13 2008 10:34, travis@....com wrote:
>+++ b/include/asm-x86/cpu.h
>@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
> #include <linux/nodemask.h>
> #include <linux/percpu.h>
> 
>-struct i386_cpu {
>+struct x86_cpu {
> 	struct cpu cpu;
> };
> extern int arch_register_cpu(int num);

Is not struct x86_cpu kinda redundant here if it only wraps around
one member?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ