[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1030.1200336639@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:50:39 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 - oddness with IPv4/v6 mapped sockets hanging...
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:22:10 EST, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu said:
> Apparently the only new commit in there since the tree that was in
> 24-rc6-mm1 is 5d95575903fd3865b884952bd93c339d48725c33 adding some warning
> printk's. Would it be more productive to test against the full tree, or
> leaving out the one commit I already reverted?
<voice=Emily Litella> Nevermind... </voice> :)
The new commit won't apply with the other one reverted - it patches
security/selinux/netnode.c which was created by the problematic commit...
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists