linux-kernel - Re: Possibly silly Q?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <E1JEWrk-0004FY-PT@bigred.inka.de>
Date:	Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:29:08 +0100
From:	Olaf Titz <olaf@...red.inka.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possibly silly Q?

> 200Mb had been filled when it had been umounted from /mnt/bootf8
> repartitioned, mke2fs'd, a journal added and a new label written and then
> mounted to /amandatapes.
>
> Something it seems to me, should have forced the re-init, but didn't.  So is

Something I stumbled across just a few days ago: fdisk does cause the
kernel to re-read the new partitions, but nothing causes udev to
create any required new device nodes...

Olaf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/