[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080114005434.48340f84@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:54:34 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: tcamuso@...hat.com
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Martin Mares <mj@....cz>, Loic Prylli <loic@...i.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
"Chumbalkar, Nagananda" <Nagananda.Chumbalkar@...com>,
"Schoeller, Patrick (Linux - Houston, TX)" <Patrick.Schoeller@...com>,
Bhavana Nagendra <bnagendr@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] Make PCI extended config space (MMCONFIG) a driver
opt-in
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:28:08 -0500
Tony Camuso <tcamuso@...hat.com> wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> >> The PCI spec provides for conf1 as an architected solution. It's not
> >> going away, and especially not in x86 land where Port IO is built-in
> >> to the CPU.
> >
> > again sadly you're wrong.
> >
>
> As someone gently pointed out to me, you are in a position to know this,
> so I probably am wrong.
I suspect Arjan is wrong. It might be some Intel agenda but I still see
fairly new driver reference code that is hardcoding port accesses even
when designed for Redmond products.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists