[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080114081418.GB18296@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:14:18 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: travis@....com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] x86: Reduce memory and intra-node effects with
large count NR_CPUs
* travis@....com <travis@....com> wrote:
> This patchset addresses the kernel bloat that occurs when NR_CPUS is
> increased. The memory numbers below are with NR_CPUS = 1024 which I've
> been testing (4 and 32 real processors, the rest "possible" using the
> additional_cpus start option.) These changes are all specific to the
> x86 architecture, non-arch specific changes will follow.
thanks, i'll try this patchset in x86.git.
> 32cpus 1kcpus-before 1kcpus-after
> 7172678 Total +23314404 Total -147590 Total
1kcpus-after means it's +23314404-147590, i.e. +23166814? (i.e. a 0.6%
reduction of the bloat?)
i.e. we've got ~22K bloat per CPU - which is not bad, but because it's a
static component, it hurts smaller boxes. For distributors to enable
CONFIG_NR_CPU=1024 by default i guess that bloat has to drop below 1-2K
per CPU :-/ [that would still mean 1-2MB total bloat but that's much
more acceptable than 23MB]
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists