[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080114082725.GD18296@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:27:25 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Cc: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mboton@...il.com" <mboton@...il.com>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix ioport unification on 32-bit [was: Re:
hwclock failure in x86.git]
* Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org> wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar (mingo@...e.hu) wrote:
> > thanks for tracking it down. I pulled that commit for now. But it would
> > be nice to figure out what's going on there.
>
> Zach was right. The unification was broken for 32-bit; it was missing
> the actual pushf/popf EFLAGS manipluation (set_iopl_mask()) and
> would've broken task switching between processes w/ different iopl in
> paravirt guests too. 64-bit sys_iopl just does pt_regs->flags
> modification and lets syscall/sysret plus ptregscall sync and do
> EFLAGS update.
>
> Also, use of volatile looks like leftover cruft.
>
> This patch in on top of Miguel's (can respin to standalone if that's
> better). [...]
thanks, applied.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists