[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080114084231.GQ6258@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:42:32 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, David Dillow <dillowda@...l.gov>,
Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrace@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] block: fix blktrace timestamps
On Mon, Jan 14 2008, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> Folks, this is getting a little silly.
It is
> Even if CONFIG_NO_HZ is new this is a an important regression, and
> yes we should avoid regressions wherever we can, and for such a quite
> important feature we should fix it. On the other hand blktrace is using
> the wrong interface, and it has been told multiple times on lkml that
> sched_clock() should never ever be used outside the scheduler. So the
> burden to fix this regression lies on the shoulders of the blktrace
> maintainer.
That is true. So far alternatives have all been slower though, so not
very tempting to transition to.
> No need for silly name calling here.
I don't know what thread you are reading, but neiter Ingo nor I have
resorted to silly name calling. The thread has long since diverted from
the original topic, though.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists