[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <478C8578.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:05:44 +0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com>
To: <ak@...e.de>
Cc: <mingo@...e.hu>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [26/31] CPA: Fix reference counting when changing
already changed pages
>+ ref_prot = canon_pgprot(ref_prot);
>+ prot = canon_pgprot(prot);
>+
> if (pgprot_val(prot) != pgprot_val(ref_prot)) {
>...
> } else if (level == 4) {
>...
> } else {
> /*
> * When you're here you either set the same page to PAGE_KERNEL
Doesn't this change require modifying the BUG() here into a BUG_ON() so
that it doesn't trigger if pgprot_val(prot) == pgprot_val(ref_prot) and
level != 4?
>+#define canon_pgprot(p) __pgprot(pgprot_val(p) & __supported_pte_mask)
While I remember you stated the inverse, I continue to think that it'd be
safer to mask out the accessed and dirty flags for the comparisons this
macro is being used for.
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists