[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1JEj3N-0000vj-QA@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:29:57 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: serue@...ibm.com
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hch@...radead.org,
serue@...ibm.com, viro@....linux.org.uk, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
kzak@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 7/9] unprivileged mounts: allow unprivileged fuse mounts
> Sounds like a sysctl to enable FS_SAFE for fuse will make this patch
> acceptable to everyone?
I think the most generic approach, is to be able to set "safeness" for
any fs type, not just fuse (Karel's suggestion).
E.g:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/fs/types/cifs/safe
This would also provide a way to query the FS_SAFE flag.
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists