lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:39:47 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Subject: Re: bugreport kernel panic on early stage, with HIGHMEM4G:


* Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb> wrote:

> Hi
> 
> After physical memory upgrade from 3GB to 4GB (also it happens on 5GB) 
> got kernel panic.
> 
> Because it is happening on early stage and my machine doesn't contain 
> serial port, i had to take photo. Kernel boots fine with 64GB highmem, 
> no highmem, or highmem4G with limited memory by mem=3G. All dmesg 
> attached. Also i attach dmidecode and lspci -vvv output, probably it 
> will be useful.

thanks for the detailed report, i think i know what's going on. Could 
you try the patch below, does it fix your problem?

this seems to be a SPARSEMEM bug which is present in v2.6.23 as well and 
has probably been present ever since SPARSEMEM was added to 32-bit x86.

There's a ~256MB hole in your e820 memory map (the pci aperture), which 
causes the last 4 sparsemem sections (each covering 64MB of RAM) to be 
not present - and they are thus missing from the sparsemem mem_map[] 
too. The highmem init code on the other hand assumes that all pages are 
in the mem_map[]:

 static void __init set_highmem_pages_init(int bad_ppro)
 {
        int pfn;
        for (pfn = highstart_pfn; pfn < highend_pfn; pfn++)
                add_one_highpage_init(pfn_to_page(pfn), pfn, bad_ppro);

the pfn_to_page() is unconditional and dereferences to a NULL-ish 
pointer which crashes your box. highend_pfn is what got miscalculated by 
256 MB, so set_highmem_pages_init() tried to reference a non-existing 
struct page - but it should still be robust enough against non-existent 
pages.

The patch below fixes this bug. Please also send a dmesg if you manage 
to boot the box up fine, i've added a few debug printouts to confirm 
this theory. (i'll figure out whether we need to clip highend_pfn as 
well - but this patch alone should be good enough to fix the crash on 
your box.)

	Ingo

------------->
Subject: x86: fix CONFIG_SPARSEMEM highmem init bug
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>

fix CONFIG_SPARSEMEM highmem init bug.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
 arch/x86/mm/init_32.c |   43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 mm/sparse.c           |    8 +++++++-
 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Index: linux/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
+++ linux/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
@@ -321,11 +321,48 @@ extern void set_highmem_pages_init(int);
 static void __init set_highmem_pages_init(int bad_ppro)
 {
 	int pfn;
-	for (pfn = highstart_pfn; pfn < highend_pfn; pfn++)
-		add_one_highpage_init(pfn_to_page(pfn), pfn, bad_ppro);
+
+	printk("set_highmem_pages_init(bad_ppro:%d)\n", bad_ppro);
+	printk("sizeof(struct page):        %d\n", sizeof(struct page));
+	printk("sizeof(struct mem_section): %d\n", sizeof(struct mem_section));
+	printk("PFN_SECTION_SHIFT:          %d\n", PFN_SECTION_SHIFT);
+
+	printk("mem_map: %p\n", mem_map);
+	printk("  highstart_pfn: %9ld [page: %p]\n",
+		highstart_pfn, pfn_to_page(highstart_pfn));
+	printk("    highend_pfn: %9ld [page: %p]\n",
+		highend_pfn, pfn_to_page(highend_pfn));
+	printk("  highend_pfn-1: %9ld [page: %p]\n",
+		highend_pfn-1, pfn_to_page(highend_pfn-1));
+
+	printk("NR_MEM_SECTIONS: %ld\n", NR_MEM_SECTIONS);
+	printk("pfn_to_section_nr(highstart_pfn): %9ld\n",
+		pfn_to_section_nr(highstart_pfn));
+	printk("pfn_to_section_nr(highend_pfn):   %9ld\n",
+		pfn_to_section_nr(highend_pfn));
+	printk("pfn_to_section_nr(highend_pfn-1): %9ld\n",
+		pfn_to_section_nr(highend_pfn-1));
+
+	printk("totalhigh_pages: %9ld\n", totalhigh_pages);
+	printk(" totalram_pages: %9ld\n", totalram_pages);
+
+	for (pfn = highstart_pfn; pfn < highend_pfn; pfn++) {
+		if (pfn_valid(pfn))
+			add_one_highpage_init(pfn_to_page(pfn), pfn, bad_ppro);
+		else {
+			if (WARN_ON_ONCE(1)) {
+				printk("bad pfn: %d\n", pfn);
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+	printk("totalhigh_pages: %9ld\n", totalhigh_pages);
+	printk(" totalram_pages: %9ld\n", totalram_pages);
+
+
 	totalram_pages += totalhigh_pages;
 }
-#endif /* CONFIG_FLATMEM */
+#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
 
 #else
 #define kmap_init() do { } while (0)
Index: linux/mm/sparse.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/mm/sparse.c
+++ linux/mm/sparse.c
@@ -295,9 +295,13 @@ void __init sparse_init(void)
 	struct page *map;
 	unsigned long *usemap;
 
+	printk("sparse_init()\n");
 	for (pnum = 0; pnum < NR_MEM_SECTIONS; pnum++) {
-		if (!present_section_nr(pnum))
+		printk("section %2ld: ", pnum);
+		if (!present_section_nr(pnum)) {
+			printk("!present\n");
 			continue;
+		}
 
 		map = sparse_early_mem_map_alloc(pnum);
 		if (!map)
@@ -309,6 +313,8 @@ void __init sparse_init(void)
 
 		sparse_init_one_section(__nr_to_section(pnum), pnum, map,
 								usemap);
+		printk("map: %p, usemap: %p [content: %08lx]\n",
+			map, usemap, __nr_to_section(pnum)->section_mem_map);
 	}
 }
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ