[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080115085931.116D.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:06:20 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch 10/19] No Reclaim LRU Infrastructure
Hi Lee-san
> > > +config NORECLAIM
> > > + bool "Track non-reclaimable pages (EXPERIMENTAL; 64BIT only)"
> > > + depends on EXPERIMENTAL && 64BIT
> > > + help
> > > + Supports tracking of non-reclaimable pages off the [in]active lists
> > > + to avoid excessive reclaim overhead on large memory systems. Pages
> > > + may be non-reclaimable because: they are locked into memory, they
> > > + are anonymous pages for which no swap space exists, or they are anon
> > > + pages that are expensive to unmap [long anon_vma "related vma" list.]
> >
> > Why do you select to default is NO ?
> > I think this is really improvement and no one of 64bit user
> > hope turn off without NORECLAIM developer :)
>
> This was my doing. I left the default == NO during
> development/experimemental stage so that one would have to take explicit
> action to enable this function. If the feature makes it into mainline
> and we decide that the default should be 'yes', that will be an easy
> change.
Oh I see.
I will help testing too for it merges to mainline early.
thanks.
- kosaki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists