[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080115163251.GC31270@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:32:51 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>,
Adrian Bunk <adrian.bunk@...ial.fi>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>, phil.el@...adoo.fr,
oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> But as mentioned, it's totally untested and I don't have (or really
> want to have) a cross-compiling environment. And I don't care *that*
> much. I just want something we can all live with.
>
> So does something like this work for people?
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 +-
> arch/arm/Kconfig.instrumentation | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
i like this approach better, not the least because it affects only one
architecture so late in the .24-rc cycle. Instrumentation bugs tend to
be found with a few weeks/months of delays. (because historically
instrumentation has been typically used by folks who cannot change their
kernel easily to debug it, i.e. by extension they dont run bleeding edge
kernels either.)
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists