[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <478CEA82.9010606@goop.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:16:50 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Folding _PAGE_PWT into _PAGE_PCD (was Re: unify pagetable accessors
patch causes double fault II)
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> -#define _PAGE_PRESENT (_AC(1, UL)<<_PAGE_BIT_PRESENT)
> -#define _PAGE_RW (_AC(1, UL)<<_PAGE_BIT_RW)
> -#define _PAGE_USER (_AC(1, UL)<<_PAGE_BIT_USER)
> -#define _PAGE_PWT (_AC(1, UL)<<_PAGE_BIT_PWT)
> -#define _PAGE_PCD ((_AC(1, UL)<<_PAGE_BIT_PCD) | _PAGE_PWT)
>
BTW, I just noticed that _PAGE_PWT has been folded into _PAGE_PCD. This
seems like a really bad idea to me, since it breaks the rule that
_PAGE_X == 1 << _PAGE_BIT_X. I can't think of a specific place where
this would cause problems, but this kind of non-uniformity always ends
up biting someone in the arse.
I think having a specific _PAGE_NOCACHE which combines these bits is a
better approach.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists