linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH x86] [15/16] Force __cpuinit on for CONFIG_PM without HOTPLUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080115184729.GB19192@does.not.exist>
Date:	Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:47:29 +0200
From:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	rjw@...k.pl, pavel@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH x86] [15/16] Force __cpuinit on for CONFIG_PM without
	HOTPLUG_CPU

On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:21:42PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>...
> > > And I will add a config option to:
> > > - set -fno-unit-at-a-time
> > 
> > I was told future gcc versions would remove that. Why do you
> > want it?
> Are there any better way to tell gcc no to inline so agressively?

I haven't tested it, but -fno-inline-functions-called-once alone 
_might_ be enough.

> 	Sam

cu
Adrian

BTW: I hope it's clear for everyone that disabling such optimizations
     should only be used for debugging section mismatches, not for
     production kernels.

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/