[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4df4ef0c0801151104j5b2d003ep72600fd7553f5832@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:04:38 +0300
From: "Anton Salikhmetov" <salikhmetov@...il.com>
To: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, jakob@...hought.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, valdis.kletnieks@...edu,
riel@...hat.com, ksm@...dk, staubach@...hat.com,
jesper.juhl@...il.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
protasnb@...il.com, miklos@...redi.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Updating ctime and mtime at syncing
2008/1/15, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:02:45PM +0300, Anton Salikhmetov wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Update the ctime and mtime stamps for memory-mapped block device files.
> > + */
> > +static void bd_inode_update_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec *ts)
> > +{
> > + struct block_device *bdev = inode->i_bdev;
> > + struct list_head *p;
> > +
> > + if (bdev == NULL)
> > + return;
>
> inode->i_bdev is never NULL for inodes currently beeing written to.
>
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
> > + list_for_each(p, &bdev->bd_inodes) {
> > + inode = list_entry(p, struct inode, i_devices);
>
> this should use list_for_each_entry.
>
>
Thank you very much for your recommenations. I'll take them into account.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists