linux-kernel - Re: [REGRESSION] 2.6.24-rc7: e1000: Detected Tx Unit Hang

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <478DC824.4030600@bigtelecom.ru>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:02:28 +0300
From:	Badalian Vyacheslav <slavon@...telecom.ru>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	elendil@...net.nl, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] 2.6.24-rc7: e1000: Detected Tx Unit Hang

applied to 2.6.24-rc7-git2
Have messages
Also have regression after apply patch.
System may do above 800mbs traffic before patch. After its "exit polling 
mode?" (4 CPU, 1 cpu get 100% si (process ksoftirqd/0), 3 CPU is IDLE)
After patch system was go to "exit polling mode" at above 600mbs.

Thanks.

> From: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:25:10 +0100
>
>   
>> kernel: e1000: eth0: e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang
>>     
>
> Does this make the problem go away?
>
> (Note this isn't the final correct patch we should apply.  There
>  is no reason why this revert back to the older ->poll() logic
>  here should have any effect on the TX hang triggering...)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
> index 13d57b0..cada32c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
> @@ -3919,7 +3919,7 @@ e1000_clean(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
>  {
>  	struct e1000_adapter *adapter = container_of(napi, struct e1000_adapter, napi);
>  	struct net_device *poll_dev = adapter->netdev;
> -	int work_done = 0;
> +	int tx_work = 0, work_done = 0;
>  
>  	/* Must NOT use netdev_priv macro here. */
>  	adapter = poll_dev->priv;
> @@ -3929,8 +3929,8 @@ e1000_clean(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
>  	 * simultaneously.  A failure obtaining the lock means
>  	 * tx_ring[0] is currently being cleaned anyway. */
>  	if (spin_trylock(&adapter->tx_queue_lock)) {
> -		e1000_clean_tx_irq(adapter,
> -				   &adapter->tx_ring[0]);
> +		tx_work = e1000_clean_tx_irq(adapter,
> +					     &adapter->tx_ring[0]);
>  		spin_unlock(&adapter->tx_queue_lock);
>  	}
>  
> @@ -3938,7 +3938,7 @@ e1000_clean(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
>  	                  &work_done, budget);
>  
>  	/* If budget not fully consumed, exit the polling mode */
> -	if (work_done < budget) {
> +	if (!tx_work && (work_done < budget)) {
>  		if (likely(adapter->itr_setting & 3))
>  			e1000_set_itr(adapter);
>  		netif_rx_complete(poll_dev, napi);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>   

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/