[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080116094640.GA2071@bitwizard.nl>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:46:40 +0100
From: Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@...Wizard.nl>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: mtime updates for mmapped files.
Hi,
I wrote a small app yesterday that updates a file by mmapping the
file (RW), changing the thing around, and then exiting.
This did not trigger a change in the mtime of the file. Thus rsync
didn't pick up that the file had changed.
I understand that tracking every change to a RW mmapped file is
costly, and thus unfeasable, but shouldn't then the close cause a
mtime update?
The server where this happened is running 2.6.21, so my apologies if
this has already been corrected.
Roger.
--
** R.E.Wolff@...Wizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 **
** Delftechpark 26 2628 XH Delft, The Netherlands. KVK: 27239233 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement.
Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific!
Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists