linux-kernel - Re: What's in sh-2.6.git for 2.6.25?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080116101747.GA26235@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:17:47 +0100
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What's in sh-2.6.git for 2.6.25?

On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 06:37:18PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 08:38:44AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 04:04:03PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > > This is a brief summary of the changes that are sitting in the sh queue
> > > for 2.6.25.
> > > 
> > > The main points to note are as follows:
> > > 
> > > 	- sh64->sh integration.
> > > 	- A handful of new CPUs (SH7721, SH7763, SH7203, SH7263).
> > > 	- SH-2A FPU support.
> > > 	- Board support updates (R2D, R7785RP).
> > > 
> > > The sh64->sh integration is basically the only thing that's really
> > > interesting, and so it's worth summarizing that a bit.
> > 
> > Any kbuild bits that needs an extra pair of eyes before
> > integration or can I postpone my review until it hits mainline?
> > If you feel confident I prefer to wait as I'm busy atm.
> > 
> Most of the kbuild bits have been pretty painless. I started out going
> the SRCARCH route, but that ended up creating a lot of additional
> duplication, so I opted to just roll them together and stick with abusing
> KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG for restricting the options. Based on the heavy sharing
> between the Kconfig options, this seemed to be the best way to go.
> 
> So, I'm reasonably content with it the way it is, but any input you have
> on cleaning it up is certainly welcome at any time :-)

I will take a look when it hits mainline then.
Ping me if you do not hear from me.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/