[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080116115144.GE22460@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:51:44 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@...gle.com>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@....com>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>,
Valerie Henson <val.henson@...il.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incremental
fsck)
On Tue 2008-01-15 18:44:26, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2008 6:07 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> > I had write cache enabled on my main computer. Oops. I guess that
> > means we do need better documentation.
>
> Writeback cache on disk in iteself is not bad, it only gets bad if the
> disk is not engineered to save all its dirty cache on power loss,
> using the disk motor as a generator or alternatively a small battery.
> It would be awfully nice to know which brands fail here, if any,
> because writeback cache is a big performance booster.
Is it?
I guess I should try to measure it. (Linux already does writeback
caching, with 2GB of memory. I wonder how important disks's 2MB of
cache can be).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists