[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <478E1D3A.1060904@openvz.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:05:30 +0300
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
CC: Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cedric Le Goater <clg@...ibm.com>, drepper@...hat.com,
Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Extend sys_clone and sys_unshare system calls API
Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Hi, Pavel,
>
> [Adding Ulrich]
>
>> I use the last bit in the clone_flags for CLONE_LONGARG. When set it
>> will denote that the child_tidptr is not a pointer to a tid storage,
>> but the pointer to the struct long_clone_struct which currently
>> looks like this:
>
> I'm probably just totally off the deep end, but something did occur to
> me: this looks an awful lot like a special version of the sys_indirect()
> idea. Unless it has been somehow decided that sys_indirect() is the
> wrong idea, might it not be better to look at making that interface
> solve the extended clone() problem as well?
We has such an idea, but as far as I know sys_indirect idea is
not yet accomplished. So I risked to propose such an extension
for sys_clone.
If Andrew says that sys_indirect is on its way to -mm tree, then
we'll surely wait and use this one for namespaces.
> jon
>
Thanks,
Pavel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists