lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080116162410.GB26898@osc.edu>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:24:10 -0500
From:	Pete Wyckoff <pw@....edu>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	dean gaudet <dean@...tic.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: nosmp/maxcpus=0 or 1 -> TSC unstable

mingo@...e.hu wrote on Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:31 +0100:
> 
> * Pete Wyckoff <pw@....edu> wrote:
> 
> > > pretty sure this is the culprit is that num_possible_cpus() > 1, 
> > > which would mean cpu_possible_map contains the second cpu... but i'm 
> > > not quite sure what the right fix is... or perhaps this is all 
> > > intended.
> > 
> > We've seen the same problem.  We use gettimeofday() for timing of 
> > network-ish operations on the order of 10-50 us.  But not having the 
> > TSC makes gettimeofday() itself very slow, on the order of 30 us.
> 
> 30 usecs is too much - even with pmtimer it's typically below 5 usecs. 
> Could you run this on your box:
> 
>   http://people.redhat.com/mingo/time-warp-test/time-warp-test.c
> 
> and send back what it reports? (run it for a few minutes)

You're right.  That 30 us comes from an old comment.  Testing with
your code shows under 5 us as you expected.  I had to hack out the
#ifndef i386 error; compiling on x86-64.  Dual-socket 2.4 GHz
Opteron 250.  TSC-warps grows continually in all situations.

On 2.6.24-rc6 + scsi-misc + random stuff, 2 processors:

 | 0.39 us, TSC-warps:983002775 | 4.81 us, TOD-warps:0 | 4.81 us, CLOCK-warps:0 

With "maxcpus=1", no broken patch to force TSC:

 | 0.33 us, TSC-warps:679679972 | 3.30 us, TOD-warps:0 | 3.30 us, CLOCK-warps:0 

With "maxcpus=1", including my broken patch to force use of TSC in
this situation:

 | 0.05 us, TSC-warps:2884019968 | 0.45 us, TOD-warps:0 | 0.45 us, CLOCK-warps:0

For giggles, an older fedora kernel (2.6.23.1-42.fc8) gives:

 | 0.87 us, TSC-warps:575054334 | 8.67 us, TOD-warps:0 | 8.67 us, CLOCK-warps:0 

		-- Pete
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ