[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lk6pvii0.fsf@saeurebad.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:32:23 +0100
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...urebad.de>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: clameter@....com, penberg@...helsinki.fi
Subject: Why is the kfree() argument const?
Hi,
is there any reason why kfree() takes a const pointer just to degrade it
with the call to slab_free()/__cache_free() again? The promise that the
pointee is not modified is just bogus in this case, anyway, isn't it?
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists