| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <E1JEvxs-0006cZ-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:17:08 +1100
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: jarkao2@...il.com (Jarek Poplawski)
Cc: cfriesen@...tel.com, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: questions on NAPI processing latency and dropped network packets
Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com> wrote:
>
> So, it was more a rhetorical trick (sorry!) to suggest, that such a
> business model of being always late with kernels might be quite
> practical and reasonable for many companies, but looks like the
> worst possible development model for Linux.
Well people are always going to operate on this model for commercial
reasons. FWIW I used to work for a company that stuck to a specific
version of the Linux kernel, and I suppose I still do even now :)
But the important thing is that if you're going to do that, then the
cost that comes with it should be borne by the company and not the
community.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists