[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080116104536.11AE.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:48:55 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: "Daniel Sp蚣g"
<daniel.spang@...il.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, "Rik van Riel" <riel@...hat.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Marcelo Tosatti" <marcelo@...ck.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] memory_pressure_notify() caller
Hi Daniel
> > > The notification fires after only ~100 MB allocated, i.e., when page
> > > reclaim is beginning to nag from page cache. Isn't this a bit early?
> > > Repeating the test with swap enabled results in a notification after
> > > ~600 MB allocated, which is more reasonable and just before the system
> > > starts to swap.
> >
> > Your issue may have more to do with the fact that the
> > highmem zone is 128MB in size and some balancing issues
> > between __alloc_pages and try_to_free_pages.
>
> I don't think so. I ran the test again without highmem and noticed the
> same behaviour:
Thank you for good point out!
Could you please post your test program and reproduced method?
unfortunately,
my simple test is so good works in swapless system ;-)
thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists