[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080116200829.26040351@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:08:29 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
Cc: "David P. Reed" <dpreed@...d.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Christer Weinigel <christer@...nigel.se>,
Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>,
Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Paul Rolland <rol@...917.net>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
rol <rol@...be.net>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80
I/O delay override.
> If the hardware required an intermediate junk I/O, that would be a
> reason to do one, but it doesn't, does it? It requires a delay. It's
> written thus in all of the application notes.
And the only instruction that is synchronized to the bus in question is
an I/O instruction.
> Wrong again. Of course one knows how long the delay should be. The bus
> speed is known.
Wrong again. ISA bus speed is neither defined precisely, nor visible in a
system portable fashion.
I'm so glad you have nothing better to do than troll, if you
actually wrote code I'd be worried it might get into something people
used.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists