[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1JFEwb-0000zs-2q@be1.7eggert.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:33:04 +0100
From: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <rmk+serial@....linux.org.uk>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] 8250_pnp: register x86 COM ports at the conventional ttyS names
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 January 2008 11:44:37 am H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
>> > + switch (port->iobase) {
>> > + case 0x3f8: return 0; /* COM1 -> ttyS0 */
>> > + case 0x2f8: return 1; /* COM2 -> ttyS1 */
>> > + case 0x3e8: return 2; /* COM3 -> ttyS2 */
>> > + case 0x2e8: return 3; /* COM4 -> ttyS3 */
>> > + }
>> > +#endif
>> > +
>>
>> Arguably, the right thing is to use the addresses present in the array
>> at address 0x400. In particular, COM3 and COM4 aren't always at those
>> addresses.
>
> Wow. I bow before your storehouse of x86 arcana :-)
>
> I guess you're referring to the "BIOS data area," which I'd never
> heard of before (but fortunately, Google knows).
You'll want to google for Ralph Brown ...
if your back allowes bowing that much.
> What would you think about doing this only for COM1 and COM2? The
> only real value for doing this in the first place is so "console=ttyS0"
> always goes to COM1, even if we don't have SERIAL_PORT_DFNS. User-
> space ought to use some sort of udev magic if it cares about persistent
> naming.
Since the first four COM ports are magic, and since using the BIOS port
numbers will move the non-legacy ports anyway, you should use all up to
four stored port numbers.
BTW1: These addresses may be used to detect ports on non-standard addresses,
but unfortunately they don't tell the IRQ.
BTW2: When I submitted a patch using the BIOS data area, I was told that it
might not exist on systems booting from non-PC firmware. This claim was not
yet backed with any knowledge, nor did anybody suggest a way to detect this
situation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists