lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:01:08 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: SLUB: Increasing partial pages On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > I sent you a mail on December 6th ... here are the contents of that > mail: Dec 6th? I was on vacation then and it seems that I was unable to reproduce the oopses. Can I get some backtraces or other information that would allow me to diagnose the problem? > Applying just patches 1-7 and 9 leads to a slight (0.34%) performance > reduction compared to slub. That is 6.45% versus slab, reduces to 6.79% > with the 8 patches applied. Patch 8 is the one that optimizes the fastpath. How much runtime variability have these tests? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists