linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 3/4] RT: remove finish_arch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <884020C16A0AFF4D8A8B7800EA0C98870FD5F7@ussdixms03.am.sony.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:17:44 -0800
From:	"Rowand, Frank" <frank.rowand@...sony.com>
To:	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
	<tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/4] RT: remove finish_arch_switch

Steve,

Thanks, I'll bring this up over on the linux-mips list to see how they
really want to handle it.

-Frank


-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Rostedt [mailto:rostedt@...dmis.org]
Sent: Tue 1/15/2008 6:14 PM
To: Rowand, Frank
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; mingo@...hat.com; tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] RT: remove finish_arch_switch
 
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:20:46PM -0800, Frank Rowand wrote:
> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>
> 
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.24-rc7/include/asm-mips/mach-tx49xx/cpu-feature-overrides.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24-rc7.orig/include/asm-mips/mach-tx49xx/cpu-feature-overrides.h
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc7/include/asm-mips/mach-tx49xx/cpu-feature-overrides.h
> @@ -1,6 +1,13 @@
>  #ifndef __ASM_MACH_TX49XX_CPU_FEATURE_OVERRIDES_H
>  #define __ASM_MACH_TX49XX_CPU_FEATURE_OVERRIDES_H
>  
> +/* finish_arch_switch_empty is defined if we know finish_arch_switch() will
> + * be empty, based on the lack of features defined in this file.  This is
> + * needed because config preempt will barf in kernel/sched.c ifdef
> + * finish_arch_switch
> + */
> +#define finish_arch_switch_empty
> +
>  #define cpu_has_llsc	1
>  #define cpu_has_64bits	1
>  #define cpu_has_inclusive_pcaches	0
> Index: linux-2.6.24-rc7/include/asm-mips/system.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24-rc7.orig/include/asm-mips/system.h
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc7/include/asm-mips/system.h
> @@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ do {									\
>  	(last) = resume(prev, next, task_thread_info(next));		\
>  } while (0)
>  
> +/* preempt kernel barfs in kernel/sched.c ifdef finish_arch_switch */
> +#ifndef finish_arch_switch_empty

I'll take this patch for now, but currently it looks like a hack. I know
you said that, but I'm hoping someone will come up with a better
solution.

Thanks,

-- Steve

>  #define finish_arch_switch(prev)					\
>  do {									\
>  	if (cpu_has_dsp)						\
> @@ -77,6 +79,7 @@ do {									\
>  	if (cpu_has_userlocal)						\
>  		write_c0_userlocal(current_thread_info()->tp_value);	\
>  } while (0)
> +#endif
>  
>  static inline unsigned long __xchg_u32(volatile int * m, unsigned int val)
>  {
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/