[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f1b08da0801161436k4a7ac1e3kd83590951e7bebb9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:36:02 -0800
From: "john stultz" <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>,
"Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Tim Bird" <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
"Sam Ravnborg" <sam@...nborg.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <srostedt@...hat.com>,
"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@...ba.org>,
"Daniel Walker" <dwalker@...sta.com>, johnstul@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 16/22 -v2] add get_monotonic_cycles
On Jan 16, 2008 6:56 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca> wrote:
> If you really want an seqlock free algorithm (I _do_ want this for
> tracing!) :) maybe going in the RCU direction could help (I refer to my
> RCU-based 32-to-64 bits lockless timestamp counter extension, which
> could be turned into the clocksource updater).
Yea. After our earlier discussion and talking w/ Steven, I'm taking a
swing at this now. The lock-free method still doesn't apply to the
update_wall_time function, but does work fine for the monotonic cycle
uses. I'll send a patch for review as soon as I get things building.
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists