[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <478F2A46.5070506@grandegger.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:13:26 +0100
From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the 2.6.24-rc8-rt1 tree, which can be
> downloaded from the location:
>
> http://rt.et.redhat.com/download/
It builds and runs fine on my Icecube-MPC5200 board, now also with the
latency tracer enabled. That's great. Still, "cyclictest -n -p80 -i1000"
reports latencies up to 400 us and therefore I tried to trigger and save
a high latency trace using:
# ./cyclictest -n -p80 -i1000 -b400
1.21 0.33 0.11 4/42 1048
T: 0 ( 914) P:80 I:1000 C: 38726 Min: 61 Act: 107 Avg: 106
Max: 377
[ 91.042169] ( cyclictest-914 |#0): new 39733427 us user-latency.
bash-3.00# cat /proc/latency_trace > trace.log
Well, I'm not sure if this is the correct way to do it. Is there some
doc on how to use the latency tracer and interpret the results?
Nevertheless, I have attached the beginning of trace.log. Maybe it rings
an experts bell.
TIA.
Wolfgang.
View attachment "trace-partial.log" of type "text/x-log" (21485 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists