linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Convert EXT2 to use unlocked

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200801171254.04071.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:54:03 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Mathieu Segaud <mathieu.segaud@...ala.cx>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sct@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Convert EXT2 to use unlocked_ioctl

On Thursday 17 January 2008, you wrote:
> 
> Change ext_ioctl() to be an unlocked_ioctl(), explicitly
> exposing BKL's uses.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Segaud <mathieu.segaud@...ala.cx>

You are now calling lock_kernel() twice in case of ext2_compat_ioctl(),
which calls back into ext2_ioctl with the BKL already held.

This is allowed with the BKL, but really bad style that you should
avoid. I assume the ext3 and ext4dev versions of your patch have
the same issue, but I didn't check in detail.

	Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/