[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080117122856.GT3940@zip.com.au>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:28:57 +1100
From: CaT <cat@....com.au>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc7: memory leak?
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:21:51PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > If that's the case it would seem to be somewhat of a pain to get and
> > kind of out of left field as I'd say most people would expect MemFree to
> > indicate the amount of memory that's no longer freely available
> > (ignoring swapping it out for simplicities sake).
>
> I'm somewhat confused as to what you're saying. How would anyone expect
> MemFree to be memory that is _not_ freely available?
I think we have conflicting ideas of what 'freely available' means here
which is causing the confusion. :)
> Or are you asking how to compute the amount of freeable memory, that is
> memory that isn't currently free, but could be freed up under pressure?
Yes. I think I am. (heh)
> If that is indeed your question, then yes, thats rather hard as slabinfo
> and the like don't indicate which buckets have shrinkers (but even if
Ah. Foo.
> they would have shrinkers there is no guarantee they'd be able to shrink
> 100%)
Whacky.
:/
--
"To the extent that we overreact, we proffer the terrorists the
greatest tribute."
- High Court Judge Michael Kirby
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists