[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <478F5E47.6000204@keyaccess.nl>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:55:19 +0100
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
To: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"David P. Reed" <dpreed@...d.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Christer Weinigel <christer@...nigel.se>,
Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>,
Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Paul Rolland <rol@...917.net>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
rol <rol@...be.net>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80
I/O delay override.
On 17-01-08 14:36, David Newall wrote:
> In the early days of clone PCs, as you know but perhaps many on this
> list might not
I'm so incredibly sick of this fucking thread. We've had enough legacy farts
coming out of the woodwork advertising their own massive experience and
cluelessness by now. Both hpa and alan are in this thread and everyone else
can be ignored on the issue.
Over the course of a 100 messages or so in this thread it's been determined
that the best course of action is to keep the out for ISA and replace it
with udelay() for chipset logic. Now go away.
Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists