[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <478F6983.5010707@siemens.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:43:15 +0100
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kgdb:unify x86-kgdb
Jason Wessel wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> diff -up arch/x86/kernel/kgdb_32.c arch/x86/kernel/kgdb_64.c
>>
>> screamed for unification. Here it is.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
>>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/Makefile_32 | 2
>> arch/x86/kernel/Makefile_64 | 2
>> arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c | 561 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/x86/kernel/kgdb_32.c | 414 --------------------------------
>> arch/x86/kernel/kgdb_64.c | 495 --------------------------------------
>> 5 files changed, 563 insertions(+), 911 deletions(-)
>>
> FYI this is already done in the head branch for kgdb which is going into
> the -mm tree. You will see the new patch set in the 2.6.25-rcX series.
>
> There is now a single x86-lite.patch which contains a number of other
> modifications to the core-lite.patch to make use of
> probe_kernel_address() and a new function probe_kernel_write(). Also
> the die hooks for the "no context" memory faults were removed.
Hmm, is this any kind of patch I should have seen in your kernel.org
git? Which branch?
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists