lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0801171014030.4378-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date:	Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:16:30 -0500 (EST)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>
cc:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	<stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>, <david-b@...bell.net>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] driver-core : convert semaphore to mutex in struct
 class

On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Dave Young wrote:

> > Your meaning isn't clear.  Do you mean that your patch doesn't generate
> > any lockdep warnings at all?  Or do you mean that it generates a single
> > lockdep warning at boot time and then no more warnings afterward?
> 
> I means the latter one.

That's very bad.

For each type of violation, lockdep only gives one error message.  So
the fact that you get one message at boot time and then no more doesn't
mean the code is almost right -- it probably means the code has lots of
errors and you're seeing only the first one.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ