linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/7] driver-core : convert semaphore to mutex in struct class

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a8e1da0801161718w573ac941jc83011e63c47ecf@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:18:36 +0800
From:	"Dave Young" <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>
To:	"Alan Stern" <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:	"Jarek Poplawski" <jarkao2@...il.com>, "Greg KH" <gregkh@...e.de>,
	stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de, david-b@...bell.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] driver-core : convert semaphore to mutex in struct class

On Jan 16, 2008 11:27 PM, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Dave Young wrote:
>
> > The lockdep warining was posted in the below thread, actually, I have
> > built and run this patced kernel for several days, there's no more
> > warnings.
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/3/2
>
> Your meaning isn't clear.  Do you mean that your patch doesn't generate
> any lockdep warnings at all?  Or do you mean that it generates a single
> lockdep warning at boot time and then no more warnings afterward?

I means the latter one.

>
> Alan Stern
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/