[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F5204368270@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:47:35 -0800
From: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Cc: "Intel E/100 mailing list" <e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux ACPI mailing list" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>, <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] 2.6.24-rc8-mm1
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:22:19 -0800 "Pallipadi, Venkatesh"
> <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> The problem is
>>>> modprobe:2584 conflicting cache attribute 50000000-50001000
>>>> uncached<->default
>>
>> Some address range here is being mapped with conflicting types.
>> Somewhere the range was mapped with default (write-back). Later
>> pci_iomap() is mapping that region as uncacheable which is basically
>> aliasing. PAT code detects the aliasing and fails the second
>> uncacheable request which leads in the failure.
its probably the e100 screaming interrupt disable quirk code doing the
mapping?
> It sounds to me like you need considerably more runtime debugging and
> reporting support in that code. Ensure that it generates enough
> output
> both during regular operation and during failures for you to be able
> to
> diagnose things in a single iteration.
>
> We can always take it out later.
FWIW (nothing) I agree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists