[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <478FCF99.4060505@davidnewall.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:28:49 +1030
From: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
To: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"David P. Reed" <dpreed@...d.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Christer Weinigel <christer@...nigel.se>,
Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>,
Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Paul Rolland <rol@...917.net>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
rol <rol@...be.net>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80
I/O delay override.
Rene Herman wrote:
> Over the course of a 100 messages or so in this thread it's been
> determined that the best course of action is to keep the out for ISA
> and replace it with udelay() for chipset logic. Now go away.
Rather than this incredible rudeness, why don't you direct your energy
towards convincing Alan of this. He's the hold-out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists