linux-kernel - Re: Fast network file copy; "recvfile()" ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801172337370.18447@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:38:58 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	"Patrick J. LoPresti" <lopresti@...il.com>
cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fast network file copy; "recvfile()" ?


On Jan 17 2008 12:53, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:

>Using 10GigE cards and the usual tweaks to tcp_rmem etc., I am
>getting single-stream TCP throughput better than 600 MB/sec.

Hm, be aware not to hit the sequence wrap :)

>1) O_DIRECT read() + send()
>2) mmap() + madvise(WILLNEED) + send()
>3) fadvise(WILLNEED) + sendfile()
>
>I am leaning towards (3), since I gather that sendfile() is supposed
>to be pretty fast.
>
>My question is what to do on the receiving end.  In short, if I want
>the equivalent of a "recvfile()" to go with sendfile(), what is my
>best bet on Linux?

splice() I think.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/