linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06b/26] Security: Make NFSD work with detached security

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <28942.1200610127@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:48:47 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, sds@...ho.nsa.gov, casey@...aufler-ca.com,
	Trond.Myklebust@...app.com, neilb@...e.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06b/26] Security: Make NFSD work with detached security

J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org> wrote:

> Just curious--why?  Are get_kernel_security(), etc., particularly
> expensive?

It involves a kmalloc().  That means an extra possibility for an error.  Plus
it may allow you to cache the result of checking whether, say, SELinux
security labels are allowed to be set when passed over NFS (if such is
possible).

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/