[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080118002443.GA4821@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:24:44 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bunk@...nel.org, Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...tin.ibm.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc8-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > Subject : jiffies counter leaps in 2.6.24-rc3
> > > Submitter : Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@...imi.it>
> > > Date : 2007-11-29 08:36
> > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/24/53
> > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9475
> > > Handled-By : Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> > > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/7/132
>
> I think this is just the printk timestamp, no? And I think Ingo fixed
> it differently.
yes. Stefano said the b43 driver is OK. The full fix is queued up for
2.6.25. (it involved changing printk.c, etc., which didnt seem warranted
- especially since the use of sched_clock() by printk was already quite
incorrect.)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists