[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1200635099.7806.3.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:44:58 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fake NUMA emulation for PowerPC (Take 2)
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 16:34 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 04:07 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > Changelog
> >
> > 1. Get rid of the constant 5 (based on comments from
> > Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com)
> > 2. Implement suggestions from Olof Johannson
> > 3. Check if cmdline is NULL in fake_numa_create_new_node()
> >
> > Tested with additional parameters from Olof
> >
> > numa=debug,fake=
> > numa=foo,fake=bar
>
>
> I'm not sure why yet, but git bisect tells me it's this patch that's
> causing the for-2.6.25 tree to explode on boot on cell machines.
This fixes it, although I'm a little worried about some of the
removals/movings of node_set_online() in the patch.
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
index 1666e7d..dcedc26 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
@@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ static int __cpuinit fake_numa_create_new_node(unsigned long end_pfn,
static unsigned int fake_nid = 0;
static unsigned long long curr_boundary = 0;
- *nid = fake_nid;
if (!p)
return 0;
@@ -60,6 +59,7 @@ static int __cpuinit fake_numa_create_new_node(unsigned long end_pfn,
if (mem < curr_boundary)
return 0;
+ *nid = fake_nid;
curr_boundary = mem;
if ((end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) > mem) {
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists