[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200801181141.55837.balajirrao@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:41:55 +0530
From: Balaji Rao <balajirrao@...il.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: setting jiffies as the clocksource stops time
On Friday 18 January 2008 04:04:33 am Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Jan 16 2008 13:20, Daniel Walker wrote:
> >On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 02:09 +0530, Balaji Rao wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> When i set jiffies as the current_clocksource, date(1) tells me
> >> that wallclock time has stopped, and soon after that, the system
> >> becomes unresponsive. This is not seen with CONFIG_NO_HZ disabled.
> >>
> >> I wonder how can jiffies be used as a clocksource.. Its value
> >> depends on the tick and when we turn off ticks, we would stop
> >> incrementing jiffies and when we come come out of idle, we update
> >> the jiffies by reading the current_clocksource which now is
> >> 'jiffies', and hence jiffies wouldn't get updated. Could this be
> >> the explanation ?
> >
> >Your right, It can't be used as a clocksource with nohz , and the system
> >will refuse to automatically switch to it ..
>
> I think that manually changing to jiffies by echoing into sysfs
> should also be prohibited.
>
Yea, right. But why not unregister jiffies as a clocksource itself when we get into NO_HZ ? I think it's much cleaner
provided it has no other consequences.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists