linux-kernel - Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1] Locking API boot-time self-tests hangs.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080118091810.GG24337@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:18:10 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>
Cc:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zan Lynx <zlynx@....org>
Subject: Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1] Locking API boot-time self-tests hangs.


* Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com> wrote:

> On Jan 18, 2008 2:40 PM, Tetsuo Handa
> <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > It could be compiler version dependent.  I used gcc-4.1.0.  Which version
> > > were you and Zan using please?
> 
> I have the same problem, gcc 3.4.6

is the patch below already in -rc8-mm1? hmm ... it appears it's not. 
Could you give it a try?

	Ingo

------------->
commit 5a26db5bd25cf4bf32ae9fa9f6136b6b6d5b45c5
Author: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Date:   Wed Jan 16 09:51:58 2008 +0100

    lockdep: fix internal double unlock during self-test
    Lockdep, during self-test (when it was simulating double unlocks) was
    sometimes unconditionally unlocking a spinlock when it had not been
    locked. This won't work for ticket locks.
    
    Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
    Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
    Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>

diff --git a/kernel/lockdep.c b/kernel/lockdep.c
index 723bd9f..4335f12 100644
--- a/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -2943,9 +2943,10 @@ void lockdep_free_key_range(void *start, unsigned long size)
 	struct list_head *head;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int i;
+	int locked;
 
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
-	graph_lock();
+	locked = graph_lock();
 
 	/*
 	 * Unhash all classes that were created by this module:
@@ -2959,7 +2960,8 @@ void lockdep_free_key_range(void *start, unsigned long size)
 				zap_class(class);
 	}
 
-	graph_unlock();
+	if (locked)
+		graph_unlock();
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 
@@ -2969,6 +2971,7 @@ void lockdep_reset_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
 	struct list_head *head;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int i, j;
+	int locked;
 
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
 
@@ -2987,7 +2990,7 @@ void lockdep_reset_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
 	 * Debug check: in the end all mapped classes should
 	 * be gone.
 	 */
-	graph_lock();
+	locked = graph_lock();
 	for (i = 0; i < CLASSHASH_SIZE; i++) {
 		head = classhash_table + i;
 		if (list_empty(head))
@@ -3000,7 +3003,8 @@ void lockdep_reset_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
 			}
 		}
 	}
-	graph_unlock();
+	if (locked)
+		graph_unlock();
 
 out_restore:
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/