linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/7] driver-core : convert semaphore to mutex in struct class

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1200653112.8706.21.camel@lov.site>
Date:	Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:45:12 +0100
From:	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
To:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc:	Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de,
	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] driver-core : convert semaphore to mutex in struct
	class

On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 08:38 +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 01:31:17PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > On Jan 18, 2008 11:18 AM, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org> wrote:
> ...
> > > Yeah, might be better to wait until class_device is gone, otherwise you
> > > may need to fix stuff that is just going to be removed. Your change to
> > > have iterators for the class devices look like a nice preparation for
> > > future changes though.
> > >
> > > Our rough plan is:
> > >  2.6.25:
> > >   - get the ~100 patches in Greg's tree (in -mm) merged :)
> > >  2.6.26:
> > > ???  - remove the 20 char limit in "struct device"
> > >   - get rid of "struct class_device"
> > 
> > Fine, thanks.
> > 
> > Let's wait for other people's comment.
> 
> Dave, I doubt you'll ever manage to do this if you're going to wait:
> probably there will be always some new changes like this around...

Well there are not "changes" in that sense, the class_device stuff will
be entirely ripped out, and I doubt we will want to change anything
there, just shortly before it's deleted.

Also your assumptions about device nesting are not really true, there is
no limit, even when there are no current users nesting deeper, and
"struct device" can be any nesting depth, and that's where it gets
interesting.

Kay

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/