[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1200617237.3839.32.camel@cinder.waste.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:47:17 -0600
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: m.kozlowski@...land.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paulus@...ba.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1: powerpc oopses
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 16:29 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Do we need `offset' at all?
Looks like no.
I wonder if there's a good argument for adding a pte_offset_val() which
would let us do:
pteval = pte_offset_val(pmd, addr);
and shrink the map/unmap window and overhead here and possibly
elsewhere?
Anyway, updated but still untested patch now with revealing comment:
diff -r 5595adaea70f fs/proc/task_mmu.c
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c Thu Jan 17 13:26:54 2008 -0600
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c Thu Jan 17 18:45:57 2008 -0600
@@ -584,18 +585,19 @@
pte_t *pte;
int err = 0;
- pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, addr);
- for (; addr != end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
+ for (; addr != end; addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
u64 pfn = PM_NOT_PRESENT;
+ pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, addr);
if (is_swap_pte(*pte))
pfn = swap_pte_to_pagemap_entry(*pte);
else if (pte_present(*pte))
pfn = pte_pfn(*pte);
+ /* unmap so we're not in atomic when we copy to userspace */
+ pte_unmap(pte);
err = add_to_pagemap(addr, pfn, pm);
if (err)
return err;
}
- pte_unmap(pte - 1);
cond_resched();
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists