[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080118120958.GB19723@does.not.exist>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:09:58 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.24 patch] x86: allow 64bit setting in Kconfig
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 01:02:48PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
>
> > > Style question, would the following be preferred?
> > >
> > > config 64BIT
> > > def_bool ARCH = "x86_64"
> > > prompt "64-bit kernel"
> > > help...
> >
> > No.
> > It is most common to let the prompt follow the type and not
> > as a separate property.
>
> hm, ok. I guess there's not much cleanliness difference between:
>
> bool "64-bit kernel"
> default ARCH = "x86_64"
>
> and:
>
> def_bool ARCH = "x86_64"
> prompt "64-bit kernel"
At least for me it's clear what the former does while I had to try the
latter for understanding what it does exactly...
> Ingo
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists